312-49v11 CHFI v11 Exam Overview
The EC-Council 312-49v11 Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI v11) exam is a professional-level cybersecurity certification designed to validate expertise in digital forensics, incident response, cybercrime investigation, and evidence handling.
The CHFI certification demonstrates a candidate’s ability to identify, collect, preserve, and analyze digital evidence while maintaining proper chain of custody and forensic methodology. It is ideal for professionals working in cybercrime investigation, SOC environments, law enforcement, and enterprise security teams.
312-49v11 CHFI Exam Details
Below are the official exam details for the CHFI v11 certification:
Exam Name: Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI)
Exam Code: 312-49 (v11)
Number of Questions: 150
Exam Duration: 240 minutes (4 hours)
Exam Format: Multiple Choice
Passing Score: 70%
Exam Cost: $650 USD
Exam Availability: ECC Exam Center / Remote Proctored
Core Topics Covered in CHFI v11
The CHFI v11 curriculum includes 35 modules, covering the complete digital forensic investigation lifecycle. Key domains include:
1. Forensic Investigation Process
First response procedures
Evidence identification and collection
Data acquisition techniques
Evidence preservation
Maintaining chain of custody
2. Operating System (OS) Forensics
Windows boot process and registry analysis
Linux and macOS file system forensics
Log file analysis and artifact examination
3. Data Acquisition & Analysis
Disk imaging and forensic duplication
File system analysis (NTFS, FAT, EXT)
Recovering deleted files and partitions
Hidden data and steganography detection
4. Memory & Network Forensics
Analyzing volatile memory (RAM)
Detecting malware and live attack artifacts
Network traffic capture and analysis
Packet investigation and intrusion tracing
5. Specialized Investigation Areas
Anti-forensics techniques and countermeasures
Web browser forensics
Email forensics
eDiscovery and legal reporting
6. Digital Forensic Tools
Candidates are expected to understand and use industry-recognized tools such as:
AccessData FTK
EnCase
Autopsy
Other forensic acquisition and analysis tools
Skills Validated by the CHFI Certification
By earning the CHFI v11 certification, professionals demonstrate the ability to:
Conduct structured digital forensic investigations
Perform evidence acquisition and forensic imaging
Analyze compromised systems after cyber incidents
Investigate malware, insider threats, and data breaches
Prepare legally defensible forensic reports
Who Should Take the 312-49v11 CHFI Exam?
This certification is ideal for:
Digital Forensic Analysts
Incident Response Professionals
SOC Analysts
Law Enforcement Personnel
Cybersecurity Consultants
IT Security Professionals
Preparation Recommendations for CHFI v11
To successfully pass the CHFI (312-49v11) exam, candidates should:
Have a solid understanding of network security fundamentals
Ideally hold or understand concepts from Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH)
Practice digital forensic investigation scenarios
Review forensic methodology and investigation processes
Study hands-on usage of forensic tools such as FTK and EnCase
Practical experience in digital evidence handling, OS forensics, and network analysis significantly increases the chances of passing on the first attempt.
Why Earn the EC-Council CHFI Certification?
The Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) certification is globally recognized and validates advanced expertise in cyber forensics and incident response. It enhances career opportunities in cybercrime investigation, digital forensics, and enterprise cybersecurity roles, making it a valuable credential for security professionals.
QUESTION 1
In a financial institution’s computer forensic investigation, suspicious activity reveals unauthorized
access to GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act)-protected customer data, raising concerns for customer safety.
However, identifying the breach’s source and extent poses significant challenges, complicating compliance with GLBA guidelines.
What steps should be taken in a GLBA-covered computer forensic investigation when unauthorized
access to sensitive customer data is discovered?
A. Ignore the incident if it does not directly threaten financial activities.
B. Share information with third parties for analysis.
C. Inform law enforcement without notifying affected customers.
D. Notify affected customers of opt-out rights and safeguard data.
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to CHFI v11 objectives under Computer Forensics Fundamentals and Regulations, Policies,
and Ethics, a forensic investigator must ensure that technical investigation activities align with
applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) mandates that
financial institutions protect customers nonpublic personal information (NPI) and respond
appropriately to any unauthorized access or disclosure.
When a breach involving GLBA-protected data is identified, the organization must follow a structured
incident response and forensic investigation process while maintaining compliance with privacy laws.
CHFI v11 emphasizes forensic readiness, legal compliance, and ethical handling of digital evidence.
Notifying affected customers of their opt-out rights and implementing safeguards to protect
compromised data are core requirements of GLBAs Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule.
Ignoring the incident violates forensic and legal responsibilities, while sharing sensitive data with
third parties risks further disclosure. Informing law enforcement alone is insufficient if customer
notification obligations are not met. Proper customer notification demonstrates due diligence,
supports transparency, and reduces legal risk. From a CHFI perspective, this approach ensures lawful
evidence handling, regulatory compliance, and preservation of organizational credibility during
forensic investigations.
QUESTION 2
Lucas, a forensic investigator, is working on an investigation involving a compromised hard drive.
To analyze the disk image and extract relevant forensic data, he decides to use a tool that integrates the
powerful capabilities of Sleuth Kit with Python scripting. Lucas wants to automate the process of
analyzing disk structures, file systems, and file recovery using Python scripts.
Which of the following tools can help Lucas leverage Sleuth Kits capabilities while using Python to perform these analysis tasks efficiently?
A. PyTSK
B. NumPy
C. PyTorch
D. PySpark
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to CHFI v11 objectives under Computer Forensics Fundamentals and Digital Forensics
using Python, investigators are encouraged to automate forensic analysis tasks to improve efficiency,
accuracy, and repeatability. The Sleuth Kit (TSK) is a widely used open-source forensic toolkit for
analyzing disk images, file systems, and recovering deleted files. To extend these capabilities using
Python, CHFI v11 highlights the use of Python bindings specifically designed for forensic purposes.
PyTSK (also known as pytsk3) is the official Python binding for The Sleuth Kit. It allows forensic
investigators to programmatically access disk images, partitions, file systems, directories, and file
metadata directly from Python scripts. This enables automation of tasks such as file enumeration,
timeline creation, deleted file recovery, and artifact extraction”core activities in disk and file system forensics.
The other options are not suitable in this context. NumPy is designed for numerical computation,
PyTorch is used for machine learning, and PySpark is intended for big data processing. None of these
tools integrate with Sleuth Kit or provide native disk forensic analysis capabilities. Therefore, PyTSK is
the correct and CHFI-aligned choice for Python-based Sleuth Kit forensic automation.
QUESTION 3
During a federal investigation, a lawyer unintentionally discloses privileged information to a federal
agency. The disclosure includes sensitive details related to a corporate client’s ongoing legal dispute.
In the scenario described, what conditions must be met for the unintentional disclosure to extend
the waiver of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection to undisclosed communications in
both federal and state proceedings?
A. The disclosed and undisclosed communications must concern different subject matters.
B. The waiver must be unintentional.
C. The disclosure must be accidental.
D. The waiver must be intentional, and the disclosed and undisclosed communications must concern the same subject matter.
Answer: D
Explanation:
This question aligns with CHFI v11 objectives related to legal compliance, rules of evidence, and
handling privileged information during forensic investigations. In digital forensics, investigators
frequently work alongside legal teams, making it critical to understand when attorney-client
privilege or work-product protection may be waived. Under the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence (Rule
502), an unintentional or inadvertent disclosure does not automatically extend the waiver of
privilege to undisclosed communications.
For a waiver to extend beyond the disclosed material, strict conditions must be met. The waiver must
be intentional, the disclosed and undisclosed communications must concern the same subject
matter, and fairness must require that the undisclosed information also be considered. CHFI v11
emphasizes that forensic investigators must preserve confidentiality, respect legal protections, and
avoid actions that could improperly broaden legal exposure during investigations.
Options B and C are incorrect because unintentional or accidental disclosures are explicitly protected
from subject-matter waiver under Rule 502. Option A is incorrect because waiver extension only
applies when communications involve the same subject matter. Therefore, Option D correctly reflects
both legal standards and CHFI-aligned best practices for evidence handling and legal awareness
during forensic investigations.
QUESTION 4
A forensic investigator is assigned to investigate a data leak involving the distribution of sensitive corporate information across multiple online platforms.
The suspect is believed to have shared the data discreetly through various public channels. To uncover evidence, the investigator needs to
collect posts, photos, videos, and user interactions from multiple networks.
The investigator requires a tool that can efficiently gather, organize, and analyze this data, ensuring the integrity of the
evidence for further investigation. Which tool would be best suited for this task?
A. LiME
B. Elastic Stack
C. Social Network Harvester
D. Guymager
Answer: C
Explanation:
This scenario aligns with CHFI v11 objectives under Network and Web Attacks and Social Media
Forensics, where investigators are required to collect and analyze digital evidence from online
platforms while preserving evidentiary integrity. When sensitive data is leaked through public or
semi-public online channels, social media and online network artifacts such as posts, multimedia
content, comments, likes, and user relationships become critical sources of evidence.
Social Network Harvester is specifically designed for social media and online platform investigations.
It allows forensic investigators to systematically collect data such as posts, images, videos,
timestamps, usernames, and interaction metadata from multiple social networks. CHFI v11
emphasizes the importance of using purpose-built tools that support structured collection, proper
documentation, and evidence preservation to maintain chain of custody and admissibility.
LiME is a volatile memory acquisition tool, Elastic Stack is primarily used for log aggregation and
analysis, and Guymager is a forensic disk imaging tool. None of these are suitable for harvesting
social media content. Therefore, Social Network Harvester is the most appropriate CHFI-aligned tool
for efficiently gathering, organizing, and analyzing social network evidence in data leakage investigations.
QUESTION 5
During a live data acquisition procedure, forensic investigators are tasked with analyzing a suspected
breach of a corporate network. The breach involves unauthorized access to sensitive files stored on
the company’s servers. Investigators aim to gather volatile data to trace the origin of the breach and
identify potential network vulnerabilities.
In a live data acquisition scenario, which types of volatile data would investigators prioritize
capturing to trace the intrusion’s origin and identify network vulnerabilities?
A. Printer driver versions and configurations
B. Current system uptime and DLLs loaded
C. Open connections and routing information
D. Mouse click activity and cursor movements
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question directly maps to CHFI v11 objectives under Data Acquisition and Duplication,
specifically live data acquisition and the order of volatility. Live forensics is critical when systems
cannot be powered down without losing crucial evidence, particularly during active or recent
network intrusions. CHFI v11 emphasizes that investigators must prioritize volatile data that can
quickly disappear when a system is shut down or network conditions change.
Open network connections, active sessions, routing tables, ARP cache, and listening ports provide
immediate insight into how an attacker accessed the system, whether lateral movement occurred,
and which external or internal IP addresses were involved. Capturing this data helps investigators
trace the intrusions origin, identify command-and-control communications, and uncover
misconfigurations or exposed services that enabled the breach.
Printer configurations and mouse activity have little forensic value in network intrusion analysis,
while system uptime and loaded DLLs are useful but secondary compared to real-time network
artifacts. CHFI v11 clearly prioritizes network-related volatile data during live acquisition to support
intrusion analysis, vulnerability identification, and incident reconstruction. Therefore, capturing open
connections and routing information is the most critical and correct choice in this scenario.
Examkingdom EC-Council 312-49v11 CHFI Exam Guide Exam pdf
Best EC-Council 312-49v11 Downloads, EC-Council 312-49v11 Dumps at Certkingdom.com
312-49 (v11) – Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) Success Stories
Thousands of cybersecurity professionals worldwide have successfully passed the 312-49 (v11) Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) exam using reliable study materials and practice questions. Here’s what candidates are saying:
Bandile Ndlela – South Africa
Voted 2 weeks ago
Upvoted 32 times
“Hello, with the new version released on 20th September, I wanted to confirm whether the questions were updated. After reviewing, I can say most of the updated content reflects the current 312-49 (v11) CHFI exam objectives. Very helpful for understanding the latest version!”
AGUIDI MAHAMAT – Chad
4 months ago
Upvoted 32 times
“95% of the questions were valid for the Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) exam. I highly recommend reviewing the answer discussions carefully, especially where some explanations need clarification. It helped me understand digital forensics concepts like evidence acquisition and chain of custody much better.”
Mahendrie Dwarika – South Africa
1 week ago
Upvoted 5 times
“More than 90% of the questions in my 312-49 (v11) CHFI exam were from here. Thank you for the excellent preparation material. It really helped me feel confident going into the 4-hour exam.”
Valisetti Ravishankar – USA
3 weeks ago
Upvoted 7 times
“Thank you for providing high-quality study materials. Although I previously used this platform for another certification, the structured format and detailed discussions are excellent for professional-level exams like CHFI v11.”
Dos Santos Daniel – Brazil
1 month ago
Upvoted 23 times
“I passed my Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (312-49 v11) exam on the 19th. Around 90+ questions were very similar to the practice materials. A few new questions appeared, but the core forensic investigation concepts were covered here.”
Arjun Patel – India
2 weeks ago
Upvoted 18 times
“The practice questions closely matched the real CHFI v11 exam format. The sections on memory forensics, network analysis, and anti-forensics were especially useful. Passed with confidence!”
Maria Gonzalez – Spain
3 weeks ago
Upvoted 14 times
“I found the modules on Windows and Linux forensics extremely helpful. Many of the OS forensic questions appeared in my actual 312-49 (v11) test. Highly recommended for anyone preparing for CHFI.”
Ahmed Hassan – United Arab Emirates
1 month ago
Upvoted 20 times
“The explanations helped me understand forensic tools like FTK and EnCase much better. The real exam had strong focus on data acquisition and reporting. Preparation here made a big difference.”
Peter Mwangi – Kenya
5 days ago
Upvoted 9 times
“The scenario-based questions on incident response and evidence handling were very similar to the actual Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI) exam. I passed on my first attempt.”
Liam O’Connor – Ireland
2 months ago
Upvoted 16 times
“The 4-hour CHFI exam can be intense, but practicing these 150-question-style simulations helped with time management. Highly useful for mastering digital forensics methodology.”
Why Candidates Trust Our 312-49 (v11) CHFI Practice Materials
✔ Updated for CHFI v11 latest exam version
✔ Covers digital forensics, memory analysis, and network forensics
✔ Focus on evidence handling and chain of custody
✔ Includes real-world scenario-based questions
✔ Helps prepare for the 150-question, 4-hour proctored exam